۲۲ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ --:--
فوری
Trump and Hegst Justified the War with Iran at the 9/11 Memorial
Analysis

Trump and Hegst Justified the War with Iran at the 9/11 Memorial

سی ان ام نیوز فارسی 2 دقیقه زمان مطالعه 39,848

At the 25th anniversary memorial of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Donald Trump and Pete Hegst, the United States Secretary of Defense, attempted to justify the ongoing war with Iran as a part of the legacy of these deadly attacks. While this event is typically dedicated to remembering the victims of the 2001 attacks, the two prominent U.S. officials referenced a war that began over six months ago and shows no end in sight.

Justifying War in the Shadow of Remembrance

In his speech, Trump specifically emphasized the importance of this war and the necessity of its continuation, trying to establish a connection between the largest terrorist attack in U.S. history and current military actions. This approach, which clearly contrasts with the spirit of honoring the 9/11 victims, faced criticism from various analysts and politicians.

Hegst, for his part, noted in his speech that U.S. national security is at risk and that the continuation of this war is essential. He emphasized that this war is not only in the interest of the United States but also of all democratic nations. These remarks came as polls indicate that the majority of Americans oppose the government's war policies.

Reactions and Criticisms

Criticism of these statements quickly spread across media and social networks. Many users and analysts viewed these remarks as an unsuccessful attempt to justify a war that has faced significant criticism. It seems that the U.S. government is trying to shift public opinion regarding the war with Iran, but these efforts have met with serious resistance from opponents.

Ultimately, this memorial became a tool for justifying a war that many Americans consider meaningless and unnecessary, rather than solely honoring the victims of 9/11. Given the current state of U.S. foreign policy and increasing criticisms, it appears that this war will remain a controversial and debated topic.

Source: theguardian.com